Monday, August 23, 2010

Dara Friedman, Bim Bam
















Dara Friedman, Bim Bam, 1999, 16 mm film installation with two slot-loading projectors, metal armature, CD player, and speakers, dimensions variable.

The simplest ideas can lead to the most interesting art. Most of the performance art installed in this exhibition at The Whitney was terribly installed, but this was perfect -- in a room by itself, the sound just loud enough to startle you every time one of the doors slammed, the projection large enough to almost wrap your body in it. The disconnect between the image and the sound still manages to be surprising, and the use of silhouettes and strange back-lit figures adds to the intensity and discomfort.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Henri Matisse, Blue Still Life















Henri Matisse, Blue Still Life, 1907, Oil on canvas. In the collection of the Barnes Foundation.

This picture of the painting is just terrible, but maybe some of the surprising moments in the work are still visible. I can't get over how audaciously the line of fruit on the left of the table lead directly into (or dissolve into) the floral pattern of the wallpaper. Or that single orange on the right side of the table. Or the strange menacing pattern on the tablecloth, or the strange sticks or feathers or strands coming out from the left of the vase, reaching towards that same floral wallpaper. You definitely can't see the strange shades of the shadows on the wall, moving from peach to red to lavender.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Christian Boltanski, No Man’s Land




















Christian Boltanski, No Man’s Land, installation. Image courtesy Park Avenue Armory.

A crane delicately picks up items of clothing from an enormous pile, carries them up to the ceiling, and drops them to slowly flutter back down to the pile. The artist talks about the transience of life and the unpredictability of death, but there is also something moving about the plight of the crane, the care of its movements, and the endlessness of its task.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Allan McCollum,













Allan McCollum, Collection of Ten Plaster Surrogates, 1982-1991. enamel on hydrostone. 106.05 x 180.34 cm (41 3/4 x 71 in.) Harvard Art Museum

McCollum's works are often discussed in terms of their anonymous, reproduced character. Which is why upon seeing the real objects, I was so struck by how insistent they are on their handmade quality. In person, the irregularities of the casting process is quite obvious, as well as the uneven layers of paint and the visible brush strokes. This transparency of process makes the works much more lovely in a way, more interesting as objects dealing with the process of art-making.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Ann Hamilton, abc

Ann Hamilton, abc, 1994/1999, Video. Image courtesy Metropolitan Museum of Art.

A closeup of a fingertip erases letters from a pane of glass, and then the film plays in reverse and the fingertip seems to be creating the letters on the pane of glass. Moving in its simplicity, this video seems to speak to the problems of creating, of communicating, the transience of our works of art. Each of the letters is unsubstantial and delicate, and they disappear and reappear in endless repetition.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Philip Guston, Ocean

Philip Guston, Ocean, 1976, Oil on canvas, 78 x 116.5 in. Image courtesy the San Antonio Museum of Art.

This is a stunning painting to happen upon in the quiet light-soaked galleries of the San Antonio Museum of Art. Expansive and richly colored, looking at it is a very physical experience, as those waves wash over you. It combines the most beautiful aspects of Guston's early and late work--the depth of color (and that magical grey!) and sensitivity of stroke and graphic sensibility and the directness and unsparing honesty and wry tenderness.

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Joseph Beuys, Telephone T----------------R


Joseph Beuys, Telephone T---R, (From Two FLUXUS-Objects, Edition of 24), dimensions variable, string, paper, paint/tin cans, 1974
. Image courtesy Mary Boone Gallery, New York.

It's hard to tell if the mystical aura around Joseph Beuys objects comes from the works themselves or from his persona, but there is always something transformative about the simplest objects. The texture of the painted cross and the twine, the just-right weathering of the cans. They perfectly evoke childhood games and military rations, these basic objects seem capable of preforming strange feats of magic and alchemy.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Donald Moffett, Lot 051608 (the white house)



Donald Moffett, Lot 051608 (the white house), 2008, Beeswax and encaustic on linen, 49 1/2 x 37 1/2 x 2 1/2 inches 125.7 x 95.3 x 6.4 cm. Image courtesy Marianne Boesky Gallery.



The work of Donald Moffett has an understated thoughtfulness and playfulness at the same time that I find very appealing. The materiality of this piece is the most important part about it--the differing shines of the paints for each section, the different weaves and textures to the linen. The pieces of linen are placed so that the weave travels in all different directions, giving the work a subtle and engrossing rhythm. The raw edges give the work a bit of an unnerving undercurrent, and there is a certain sadness to the palette.

Friday, January 1, 2010

Cildo Meireles, Missão/Missões (How to Build Cathedrals)













Cildo Meireles, Missão/Missões (How to Build Cathedrals), 1987, approximately 600.000 coins, 800 communion wafers, 2000 bones, 80 paving stones and black fabric. 93” x 20’ x 20’. Image courtesy the Tate Modern, seen at The Blanton Museum of Art, Austin, TX.



There is something quite magical about this work in person that can't be captured in the many many photographs that have been taken of it. The coins in the bottom (pennies, in its installation at The Blanton) glow in the warm light. The communion wafers seem to balance magically. The bones on the ceiling don't look like bones, but like glowing marble or paper lanterns. The translucent black fabric creates an intimate atmosphere and enhances the magical glow.

In some ways this might be a criticism of the piece, that it aestheticizes a history of pain and violence of the colonization of Latin America. But the beauty adds to the complexity of the work, and shows how the elements of colonization can appeal even as they destroy.